www.theplague.fora.pl

clkelyqld2 · Posted: Mon 7:55, 07 Oct 2013 Post subject: jordan Dimensional Negotiations

Morgan is a writer who works with Uk Best Writing service, He has experience of more than ten years in acdemic writing. He provides students with Uk research papers, essays writing service UK and Uk essay service online.
Arguably, negotiation is one of the most common methods of dispute resolution. The assumption that negotiation is a concept that is only useful in a conflict solving environment is a serious misconception. Apparently, negotiation is used in such environments as the political and the business fields. Notably, negotiation has been the most effective method of control sharing in the world of politics. Similarly, negotiation is applied in making of business contracts and setting of prices. Haggling is one of the most common [url=http://www.mnfruit.com/airjordan.php]jordan[/url] types of negotiation in everyday business transactions. The aim of negotiation is mainly to establish a [url=http://www.maximoupgrade.com/hot.php]hollister france[/url] middle-ground with which either party is comfortable and contented. For a long time, people have always seen negotiation as a social theory that requires only skills and tactics during the round table meeting. However, modern day negotiators are using the revolutionary process of negotiation referred to as the 3-dimensional negotiation. This paper seeks to explain the elements of three dimensional negotiations as explained by Lax and Sebenius (2006).
According to lax and Sebenius (2006), negotiation is not effective if given the usual one dimension style. They argue that traditionally, negotiations entailed the use of tactics to either gain the advantage under the topic of conflict or have such benefit distributed among the concerned parties. The usual one dimensional approach to negotiations [url=http://www.1855sacramento.com/moncler.php]moncler outlet[/url] sought either a win-win result or a win-lose outcome. However, practically speaking, such outcomes could only create more conflict where the parties to the clash were more than two. Lax and Sebenius (2006) explain that one-dimensional approaches only stimulate more conflict and yield unsatisfactory deals. Much like a gambling game, one-dimensional techniques are not appropriate where the other party is the holder of all the cards. It is for this reason that the two scholars came up with the three dimensional approach.
The three dimensional system is a method of handling negotiations from three perspectives. According to the consultants, the three aspects of this approach are, The Tactics Dimension, The Deal Design Dimension and the Set up Dimension. In addition to these dimensions, Lax and Sebenius (2006) explained a final aspect referred to as the three dimensional audit. The three aspects of the [url=http://www.rtnagel.com/airjordan.php]nike air jordan pas cher[/url] strategy are designed in such a way that they cover the period [url=http://www.ilyav.com/uggpascher.php]ugg pas cher[/url] before the negotiations, during the actual discussion and after the deal are sealed. The set up dimension takes place away from the negotiation grounds. [url=http://www.otsu.ed.jp/ktt-e/bbs/bbs.cgi/bbs.cgi]boots ugg pas cher Mixing Up [/url] The side concerns itself with the parties to conflict and the subject matter of the conflict. In evaluating this dimension, the planner or the negotiator focuses on the actual parties involved [url=http://www.mxitcms.com/abercrombie/]abercrombie[/url] in the conflict as well as the potential participants.
In addressing the issue of the parties expected to attend the negotiation proceedings, the negotiator finds information on which to rely when planning the tactics. The set-up dimension is as well concerned with the subject matter of the negotiator. The negotiator seeks to establish ways in which the subject matter can be useful to them and how valuable they can be to the other party. The essence of this aspect then can be said to be the evaluation of the pie to be shared. Being a preliminary stage, the set-up section concerns itself with estimating the possible outcomes and expected maximum [url=http://www.nxxilian.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=105438][/url] costs. Lax and Sebenius (2006) argue that, in every negotiation procedure, there are unavoidable costs. Either party should make a provision for such costs prior to the actual negotiation process. Among the essential preliminary steps are the arrangements to hold private consultations with the key parties to the actual negotiations. This may involve the process of identifying the correct sequence of events, as well as, the hierarchy to be observed. Lax and Sebenius (2006) summarized this aspect as the process that concerns itself with doing the correct things, and [url=http://www.1855sacramento.com/peuterey.php]peuterey outlet[/url] doing them right.
The second dimension - the deal design - concerns itself with the events that take place both at and away from the table of negotiation. The deal design should be in such a manner that it takes into consideration the interests of both parties. As such the negotiator is expected to unveil the intentions of the other party. This will enable them to be more realistic in laying down their strategies and listing their expectations. According to Lax and Sebenius (2006), the negotiator should plan in such a way that the negotiations move north east [url=http://www.mxitcms.com/tiffany/]tiffany outlet[/url] on a Cartesian plane. This is to suggest that one side of the plane represents the planner's interests while the [url=http://www.thehygienerevolution.com/barbour.php]barbour paris[/url] other scale represents the interests and intentions of the other. In moving north east, Lax and Sebenius (2006) meant that both parties' interests are catered for. Additionally, the deal design should [url=http://www.rtnagel.com/louboutin.php]louboutin pas cher[/url] be in such a way that the deals made are long lasting and unalterable.
Tactics, which make up the last dimension, are the real, convincing techniques applied at the negotiating table in both creating and claiming a fair share of the pie. The tactics should be strong and capable of winning the interests of the negotiator. Lax [url=http://www.scqldbz.com/wMcms_GuestBook.asp]boots ugg[/url] and Sebenius (2006) argue that the negotiator ought to listen actively, study carefully and apply relevant questions in order to achieve a competitive bargaining power. In addition to the above three discussed [url=http://www.mxitcms.com/tiffany/]tiffany[/url] dimensions, the negotiator should carry out an assessment referred to as the three [url=http://www.ilyav.com/uggpascher.php]boots ugg pas cher[/url] dimensional audit. This assessment is designed to expose the potential problem relating to the actual deal. After revealing the problems, negotiator should come up with an effective strategy to deal with such hiccups.

clkelyqld2 · Posted: Tue 5:17, 08 Oct 2013 Post subject:

By:
If you own a property which you are planning to sell, be sure to consult a tax advisor or get informed about tax law before doing so. Many real estate agents also know the subtleties of property selling and taxation. Several small points can make the difference between having to pay capital gains tax or not.
Capital gains is something that not many of us worry about because we only have the one home which is often only sold in order to buy another [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] property. Usually the next property will cost more money and will be a like-kind property so the question of capital gains tax never arises.
However, until now, there has been a little known tax clause which had taxed the most unsuspecting of people with capital gains. These people are newly widowed women, who suddenly find that they will now be taxed as a single woman. On top of losing a spouse, they also had to worry about losing a large chunk of their assets in the [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] form of money from the sale of their family home.
When a home is sold, it has usually been the property [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] of joint owners (most commonly husband and wife) and each owner is allowed to claim $250,000. This means that, for tax purposes, the average couple can [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] exclude up to $500,000 of gain - provided that they have used the house as a principal residence for a cumulative two of the previous five years.
In most cases, being able to 'write off' a $500,000 profit margin means most of us are not concerned with capital gains tax.
But what happens when [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] a spouse suddenly dies? The capital gains or the profit allowed on the sale of the house is now only one person's allowance of $250,000. If you and your husband were married in the 1940s and lived all your life in the same house, then death of one of the spouses would incur heavy taxes on the sale of the property.
The IRS has just stepped in to change this situation, [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] but with all the mortgage rate controversy, it has slipped by almost unnoticed.
Until now, [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] the only way to qualify for the full $500,000 capital gains allowance was to sell your home in [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] the same year in which your spouse died. In other words, it would be the last year that you could file a tax return as a married person, so it would be the last year that any taxation could be applied to the married -deceased- spouse.
Apart from the shock of losing a spouse and thinking about selling your home all in the same time period [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] - what happens if your spouse dies in November? You have one month to get your act together!
Theoretically, most husbands or wives inherit their spouse's share of the property at what is called a 'stepped-up' tax basis, but now [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] that the IRS has introduced new legislation for the spousal death situation, everyone can breathe more easily.
The new change in the law, introduced at [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] the end of 2007, now gives surviving spouses a full two years to claim the "double" allowance of $500,00 on capital gains, even though, by law, they are now single.
:
Visit [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] the website to learn about and .
相关的主题文章:

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]