www.theplague.fora.pl

clkelyqld2

's high-speed rail charges, lawyers Zhuyun De Shenzhen, Guangzhou-Shenzhen-Hong Kong Passenger will be a limited liability company a piece of paper v. sued to court, ordered to return to its high-speed rail company Guangzhou-Shenzhen-Hong Kong Passenger in Guangzhou,[url=http://www.theirongatetn.com/woolrich_outlet.php]woolrich[/url], Shenzhen, north to the southern section of the overcharged Tickets cost 29 yuan. But then the Guangzhou Railway Transport Court to appeal is actually ticket pricing mechanism,[url=http://www.kotitle.com/barbour_jackets.php]barbour sale[/url], courts do not belong to the scope of the grounds of inadmissibility. Also yesterday, the lawyers appealed, saying the court had rejected "reason with the facts, absurd." Guangzhou-Shenzhen-Hong Kong Express Rail priced a little high the lawyer said he is currently calculated according to the relevant laws and regulations, and now high-speed rail pricing is relatively high, a violation of the legitimate rights and interests of consumers. He told reporters that due to work, he must often travel to Shenzhen, Guangzhou and Changsha,[url=http://www.iprase.tn.it/woolrich.php]woolrich[/url], three,[url=http://cgi.www5d.biglobe.ne.jp/~riding/aska/aska.cgi/aska.cgi%2Bresult:%2Bchosen%2Bnickname%2B%252522robxpv47%252522%3B%2Bsuccess%3B%2B/home.php%253Fmod%3Dspace%26uid%3D%2Badmirable%26tbs%3Dqdr:d%26ct%3Dclnk]http://cgi.www5d.biglobe.ne.jp/~riding/aska/aska.cgi/aska.cgi%2Bresult:%2Bchosen%2Bnickname%2B%252522robxpv47%252522%3B%2Bsuccess%3B%2B/home.php%253Fmod%3Dspace%26uid%3D%2Badmirable%26tbs%3Dqdr:d%26ct%3Dclnk[/url], also repeatedly ride from the Guangzhou-Shenzhen-Hong Kong Passenger Shenzhen North Station to Guangzhou South Railway Station. However, based on "State Planning Commission on high-grade soft-seat fast train fares reply" (denominated tube No. 19971068) requirements,[url=http://kenkyu.sakura.ne.jp/ogasawara/bbs/bbs.cgi]http://kenkyu.sakura.ne.jp/ogasawara/bbs/bbs.cgi[/url], running speed can reach more than 110 kilometers per hour EMU train fare benchmark price of second-class soft seat seater 0.2805 yuan, can fluctuate 10%, so ordinary EMU second seat maximum fare per kilometer is not more than 0.31 yuan. Secondly,[url=http://www.theirongatetn.com/peuterey.php]peuterey outlet[/url], the Guangzhou-Shenzhen-Hong Kong Express Rail as the Wuhan-Guangzhou high-speed rail extension cord should be based on the Wuhan-Guangzhou high-speed rail pricing standard pricing. Now running the Wuhan-Guangzhou high-speed rail length 1068.6 km,[url=http://www.gzgsbbs.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=145]http://www.gzgsbbs.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=145[/url], the fare per kilometer is about 0.435 yuan,[url=http://www.atc.unican.es/cl.php]louboutin pas cher[/url], if the execution Wuhan-Guangzhou high-speed rail for the same price standard, Guangzhou-Shenzhen-Hong Kong section of the Guangzhou-Shenzhen high-speed rail should be second-class seat fare is 46 yuan, more than Wuhan-Guangzhou high-speed rail higher than the 29 yuan. Zhuyun De said the Guangzhou-Shenzhen-Hong Kong Express Rail is related to the vital interests of the public service products, it shall implement government guidance. Now appellee to more than twice higher than the price of government guidance price, not only violates the "Price Law" the relevant provisions,[url=http://www.theirongatetn.com/moncler.php]moncler[/url], but also as a serious infringement of the appellant's rights of consumers. Previously,[url=http://www.pharmcareusa.com/libraries/]doudoune moncler pas cher[/url], he sued the Guangzhou Railway Transport Court, requesting the court determines the return overcharged fare 29 yuan. Why do not accept my lawsuit Subsequently, the Guangzhou Railway Transport Court to the appellant's appeal is to train the pricing mechanism, does not belong to the scope of people's civil courts on the grounds of the appellant shall be inadmissible. However,[url=http://www.farm-biz.co.jp/cgi-bin/light/light.cgi?page670=val]http://www.farm-biz.co.jp/cgi-bin/light/light.cgi?page670=val[/url], in a civil complaint,[url=http://neko.bbplus.net/projectx/index.cgi]http://neko.bbplus.net/projectx/index.cgi[/url],[url=http://www.kordil.net/packages/]woolrich outlet[/url], the appellant has made clear that, because appellee in violation of state ticket pricing mechanism,[url=http://laobian.org/home.php?mod=space&uid=126]http://laobian.org/home.php?mod=space&uid=126[/url], not in accordance with government guidance pricing and asked appellee illegally overcharged ticket refund fee 29 yuan. Throughout the appellant's appeal against the appellant are illegal pricing, rather than our ticket pricing mechanism, Guangzhou Railway Transport Court of inadmissibility grounds is indeed absurd excuse. Mr. Zhu said he would insist in the end to fight the lawsuit, as it relates to the rights and interests of many consumers, so on this issue, "purists" is worth it. In addition,[url=http://www.idzly.com/bbs/home.php?mod=space&uid=163289]http://www.idzly.com/bbs/home.php?mod=space&uid=163289[/url],[url=http://www.cravencountyhomes.com/moncler_pas_cher.php]doudoune moncler[/url], he said, "I January 10,[url=http://www.kotitle.com/mulberry_outlet.php]mulberry outlet[/url], 2013 to the Guangzhou Railway Transport Court sued the hospital for filing material after March 29, 2013 before making a civil ruling inadmissible according to ' Civil Law 'Article 123,[url=http://noaginella.tv/2013/03/02/justin-hollandaka-the-frother-takes-suping-to-the-next-level-while-stranded-in-a-remote-part-of-brazils-southern-coast-the-result-of-3-days-with-no-waves/#comment-77003]http://noaginella.tv/2013/03/02/justin-hollandaka-the-frother-takes-suping-to-the-next-level-while-stranded-in-a-remote-part-of-brazils-southern-coast-the-result-of-3-days-with-no-waves/#comment-77003[/url], in line with the conditions for prosecution,[url=http://www.iprase.tn.it/woolrich.php]woolrich outlet[/url], it should be filed within seven days and notify the parties; does not meet the conditions for prosecution, it shall be made within seven days ruling inadmissible,[url=http://www.cravencountyhomes.com/moncler_pas_cher.php]doudoune moncler pas cher[/url], but in the appellant's repeated reminders, the only on March 29, 2013 to make the civil ruling, without undue delay of nearly three months. "(original title: Shenzhen lawyers to prosecute high-speed rail to retire 29 yuan)